Seminal Readings in Ecology
Welcome to the Biol 953 webpage
3 of the best final essays:
What papers should all ecologists be very familiar with? This graduate-level course will be focussed on student-led seminars of a wide range of writings that are considered really core to the advances ecology has made in the last 100 years. Each week we will discuss a major concept in ecology by considering the contribution of key primary papers to the development of that concept. Together, we will identify and explore the origins and development of a wide range of ecology’s fundamental concepts. For example, depending on student interest, we could address the concepts of ‘niche’, ‘diversity’, ‘competition/disturbance’, ‘physiological trade-offs’, ‘scale’ and ‘sustainability’ by reading and discussing such seminal papers as:
Grinnell’s The Niche Relationships of the Californian Thrasher; and Hutchinson’s Concluding Remarks
Hutchinson’s Homage to Santa Rosalia; or, Why are there so many kinds of animals?; and Ehrlich and Ravens’ Butterflies and Plants: A study in Coevolution
Connell’s The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus; and Lindeman’s The Trophic-Dynamic aspect of Ecology
Garnier’s Resource capture, biomass allocation and growth in herbaceous plants; or Coley’s Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defence
Levin’s The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology; and Turner’s Landscape Ecology - The effect of Pattern on Process
Hardin’s The Tragedy of the Commons; and Costanza’s The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital
Additional or alternative papers that are central to the origin of other fundamental concepts in any aspect of ecology will be identified by participants as the course develops. The overall goal of the course is to chart the history, subsequent development, and future direction of a broad selection of the fundamental concepts in ecology by familiarizing participants with some of ecology’s most seminal papers.
Assessment: Students will choose an ecological concept that particularly interests them, and present a seminar and write an essay paper for group discussion and assessment.
Office: Room 2508. Tel. (613) 533 6152. Fax: (613) 533 6617
Lab: Rooms 2605, 2606. Tel. (613) 533 6000 ext. 78101
Lab web page: Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology lab page
times: To be mutually determined by consultation with all registered students
Location: Room to be determined, Biosciences building
Canada K7L 3N6
Queens Biology Department: http://www.queensu.ca/biology/
Queens main page: http://www.queensu.ca/
15% Participation in discussion
15% Typed questions for the seminars
40% Research Paper (20% initial draft; 20% final paper)
Instructor approval to determine level of interest and enthusiasm for learning about the core concepts in ecology.
Upper-level undergraduate courses in ecology, microbiology, physical geography, and geology would be helpful.
|Week beginning||Day and time||Convenor||Concept||Seminar question||Reading|
|09 January||Wed. 16.30||Paul||Organisational meeting|
|16 January||Thursday 10.45||Casper Christiansen||Optimal allocation theory in organisms||How has our understanding of nutrient acquisition and allocation in organisms progressed?||Chapin FS, Schulze ED, Mooney HA (1990). The Ecology and Economics of Storage in Plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 423-447|
|23 January||Thursday 10.45||Emily Stewart||Controls on species richness in ecological communities||How do the controls on species diversity differ between plants and animals?||Hutchinson, G.E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia; or Why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist 93: 145-159|
|30 January||Thursday 10.45||Samantha Tavenor||Ecological integrity||How has the framework of ecological integrity evolved over the years, and what is its use in policy and environmental management?||Karr, J.R. and Dudley, DD. (1981) Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5(1):55-68|
|6 February||Thursday 10.45||Stefan Bengtson||Competitive Exclusion||Is the competitive exclusion principle still useful in understanding the role of competition in structuring ecological communities?||
Hardin, G. (1960) The Competitive Exclusion Principle. Science 131 1292-1297; Hutchinson, G.E. (1961) The Paradox of the Plankton The American Naturalist 95 137-145.
|13 February||Thursday 10.45||Alex Djorjevic||Sustainability||What are the constraints on using the 'Tragedy of the Commons' as a framework for ecological management?
||Hardin, G. (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243-1248|
|Thursday 10.45||Stephanie Greer||Evolutionary ecology: Interactions within and between species||What are the key factors underlying the initiation and maintenance of cooperation within species, and between species?||Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. (1981) The Evolution of Cooperation. Science 211 (4489): 1390-1396|
|27 February||Thursday 10.45||Kimberley Lemmen||Metacommunities||How has the metacommunity concept changed our understanding of community structure?||Leibold, M.A. et al. (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601-613|
|5 March||Thursday 10.45||Brian Kielstra||Scale in Ecology||How does using the transfer of information between scales affect the predictive capacity of our work in ecology?||
Levin, S. A. (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73: 1943-1967
|Friday 14.30||Michelle Mazzocato||Disturbance||How has the concept of ecological disturbance developed over time?||Connell, J.H. (1978) Diversity in Tropical Rainforests and Coral Reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310|
|12 March||Thursday 10.45||Ariel Gittens||Food web dynamics: Impacts of invasive species||What role do "top predators" play in maintaining species diversity?||Paine, R. (1966) Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity. The American Naturalist 100: 65-75|
|Friday 14.30||Allyson Parker||Evolutionary ecology||How important is natural selection in today's ecology?||Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme. Proceeding of the Royal Society London B 205:581-598|
|19 March||Thursday 10.45||Floxy Akhuetae||The niche concept and how it may apply to human societies||How does the niche concept relate to human societies?||Grinnell, J. (1917) The Niche Relationships of the Californian Thrasher. The Auk 34: 427-433|
|26 March||Thursday 10.45||Sarah Allux||Deep ecology's links to ecosystem ecology||How have Odum's ecosystem development theory and Naess's theories of deep ecology contributed to our present understanding of “the ecosystem”?||
Odum, E. P. (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262-270;
|2 April||Thursday 10.45||Paul||Synthesis|
Last Updated: 11th June 2012